Insect evolution: a major problem for Darwinism
نویسنده
چکیده
Insects provide a severe challenge for Darwinian evolution. In contrast with the vertebrate fossil record, for example, where only bones are available, evolutionary speculation can run wild, but the exquisite detail of fossil insects has produced virtual silence on this front. A review of the insect fossil record literature reveals a complete lack of evidence for the evolution of insects and other arthropods. This is true in spite of an abundance of fossil insects preserved in amber, coal, volcanic ash, tar, and other environments dating back to the Cambrian era. The evolution of insect flight, wing folding, compound eyes and metamorphosis in particular lack fossil evidence—and these have presented significant difficulties for Darwinism for over a century and a half. The major differences between ancient and modern insects are that ancient insects were either larger than those of today or they have become extinct.
منابع مشابه
The giraffe’s neck: another icon of evolution falls
The giraffe is a major problem for Darwinism for many reasons. No evidence exists in the fossil record for giraffe evolution, nor are evolutionists able to explain why the giraffe’s neck evolved. The most common Darwinian explanation for giraffe neck evolution—the advantage a long neck gave in reaching leaves high in trees for food—is now recognised by evolutionists as likely incorrect, and as ...
متن کاملDarwin's goldmine is still open: variation and selection run the world
The scientific contribution of Darwin, still agonized in many religious circles, has now been recognized and celebrated by scientists from various disciplines. However, in recent years, several evolutionists have criticized Darwin as outdated, arguing that "Darwinism," assimilated to the "tree of life," cannot explain microbial evolution, or else was not operating in early life evolution. These...
متن کاملDarwinism in economics: from analogy to ontology
Several social scientists, including ‘evolutionary economists’, have expressed scepticism of ‘biological analogies’ and rejected the application of ‘Darwinism’ to socio-economic evolution. Among this group, some have argued that self-organisation is an alternative to biological analogies orDarwinism.Others have seen ‘artificial selection’ as an alternative to natural selection in the socio-econ...
متن کاملLamps: A Test Problem for Cooperative Coevolution
We present an analysis of the behaviour of Cooperative Co-evolution algorithms (CCEAs) on a simple test problem, that is the optimal placement of a set of lamps in a square room, for various problems sizes. Cooperative Co-evolution makes it possible to exploit more efficiently the artificial Darwinism scheme, as soon as it is possible to turn the optimisation problem into a co-evolution of inte...
متن کاملDo we need an extended evolutionary synthesis?
The Modern Synthesis (MS) is the current paradigm in evolutionary biology. It was actually built by expanding on the conceptual foundations laid out by its predecessors, Darwinism and neo-Darwinism. For sometime now there has been talk of a new Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), and this article begins to outline why we may need such an extension, and how it may come about. As philosopher K...
متن کامل